Posts Tagged ‘license models’

Software Pricing and Packaging Best Practice Advice from Software Pricing Partners

By John Lipsey The software industry is rapidly changing and becoming more commoditized.

What is the ISO-19770-3 Standard and How Will it Make Software License Compliance Easier?

By: Mathieu Baissac I've had the honor of being part of the working group that has been creating the ISO-19770-3 standard for the last few years. The scope of the ISO/IEC 19770-3 standard for software entitlements is quite large: Provide customers a mechanism to receive, in a standard format, a recording of their entitlements Establish processes by which this information moves from Publishers through the channel and to the customers Provide mechanism for customers to create their own -3 tags (in case publishers do not provide them) Provide enough information in the tag itself so that: Customers can understand rights and limitations Customers can potentially validate actual compliance

All The Hype Around SaaS and Subscription = CONFUSION!

By Mathieu Baissac Recently I had a call with some folks who were responsible for process improvements in the company's ” Quote-To-Cash” processes. They work at a very large software/hardware producer (household name withheld). They asked all kinds of questions, including:

User Centric Computing: Implications for Software Licensing

By Bashyam Anant Over the past year, there has been an increasing buzz around User Centric Computing, especially in the enterprise IT context. Very little has been written about what this trend implies for software publishers. This article will demystify User Centric Computing as it relates to its impact on software licensing from the perspective of software publishers. What is User Centric Computing? Unlike IT's traditional “device-centric” approach, user-centric computing is all about providing business users with a seamless and personalized experience of all their applications regardless of their device, location, operating system and network connectivity. Enterprise IT benefits by being able to secure and manage users and their environments centrally. As pointed out in another blog ” Getting Started with User Centric Computing ” — user-centric computing gives users control of their computing experience, providing them with access to any combination of computing environments, applications, settings, and data from any location or device.

The Next Evolution of Software Licensing: Monetization of Usage Data

By Tu Le As more companies (both software publishers and intelligent device manufacturers) move towards virtualization, software licensing is evolving from on-premises licensing models—concurrent, node-locked, perpetual, etc.—to monetization software license models based upon usage data—pay-per-logon, pay-per-use, pay-per-period, etc. The market trend for 2012 and beyond labeled as “adopting Cloud” is becoming more mainstream and ubiquitous because, in the past 5 years,

Supercharge your Software Licensing Revenue & Digital Goods Revenue Streams

By Cris Wendt Ever hear of “entitlement management”? If not, you may be behind your competitors when it comes to creating maximum value from your digital goods, including software licenses. Entitlement management is the idea behind Apple's iTunes, which is part of the reason Apple is one of the highest value companies in the world. Entitlement management is also commonly used in the hotel and travel industry. Where entitlement management is also critical but poorly understood, is in the software industry and intelligent device markets (where device functions are enabled with digital access codes or licenses). Digital goods (including software, digital access codes to enable device functions, music, video, etc.) are sold to specific users or organizations based upon a set of usage rights that are called an entitlement . They are the cornerstone of provisioning value in the digital commerce world. These rights define value, and in some cases limits to value which can be redeemed, refreshed, or even expire over time. For example, I can download songs from iTunes on up to 5 different devices and play the songs into perpetuity. If I buy an anti-virus software license, I am entitled to receive and apply updated signature files for the duration of my subscription period. In the airline industry, I can buy an entitlement to fly between San Francisco and Boston in a coach seat. If I fly enough and accrue frequent flier miles, I receive additional entitlement rights in terms of upgrades, so that I may be entitled to fly in a business class seat (although that doesn't happen as much as I'd like). The management of the access and redemption (or fulfillment) of these rights is called entitlement management . Entitlement management is primarily a customer-facing activity, and should empower the customer to do business with the vendor on their time and schedule. Effective entitlement management should allow customers to buy entitlements from different sales channels, but have all entitlements accrue collectively into a customer account where they can managed by the customer through a self-serve portal. For example, I can buy songs from Apple direct from the iStore, or, I can buy a gift card and add it to entitlements in my account. I can buy airline tickets from the airline directly, or, from my travel agent. In both cases, the entitlements to fly appear in my single frequent flier account. Over time, it's this ease and fun of doing business that keep my loyalty and drives up my business value. For software companies and device manufacturers, having an effective entitlement management system is important, but surprisingly few excel, many fail because they think what they need is ERP software, and not a more flexible entitlement management system. Symptoms of poor entitlement management include: low support renewal rates, inability to up-sell, low net promoter scores on customer satisfaction surveys, slow order processes, inability to move to new license models, incorrect customer shipments, poor compliance processes and delayed revenue recognition. Next week – Attributes of a Good Entitlement Management System

Why SaaS Software Needs Licensing Too

By Mathieu Baissac SaaS software is often seen as the panacea that simplifies all licensing terms and agreements—except, it's not true. As the product manager of an enterprise back-office product that was sold as both an on-premises and SaaS solution for more than 10 years,

Insights from Citrix: Software Licensing Implications of Virtualization and the Cloud

By John Lipsey At the recent SoftSummit conference, Ron Bauman, program manager for the worldwide licensing program at Citrix, shared some insights with Flexera Software.

The Cloud is Here: Are Software Vendors and Intelligent Device Manufacturers Prepared?

By John Lipsey Cloud-based computing has transformed the way people think about purchasing and consuming business software. Like ala carte dining rather than all you can eat, the Cloud has opened up entirely new revenue streams for providers to enable value based on new delivery models such as burst-of-use and pay-per-use, to name a couple. There are many software licensing implications tied to Cloud computing. And they all assume that application producers can track their customers' software usage and enforce it according to the relevant licensing arrangement. But can they? According to our 2011 Key Trends in Software Pricing & Licensing Survey , software vendors and intelligent device manufacturers have a ways to go. According to the survey, 47% of application producers say they either do not have technology in place that enables them to know what product, product version or platforms their customers are using – or they simply do not know.

Webinar: 2011 Key Trends in Software Licensing and Pricing & 2012 Predictions

By Ann Reist The 2011 Key Trends in Software Licensing and Pricing Survey, prepared jointly by Flexera Software and

Maintenance Deserves the Same Respect as Your Software License

By Cris Wendt and Anna Connell IDC conducted a survey a few years ago that illustrated the importance of software maintenance to the overall revenue stream of an enterprise software company (generally offering a perpetual software license model). The result of the analysis was a simple, compelling graph. One line was the license revenue growing at an annual compounded rate of 7% (healthy, but not spectacular), and the other line showed the growth of maintenance revenue, priced at 20% (annually) of the associated perpetual license with an 85% renewal rate. It showed that within 10 years, the maintenance revenue was a greater portion of overall revenue than license revenue (and continues to grow). This illustrates the power of maintenance revenue over an ever-increasing software installed base. However, in the spirit of a marketing perception audit, if maintenance were a person, it would be Rodney Dangerfield, and would be quipping, “Hey, I get no respect”. While software companies generate substantial amounts of money from maintenance, maintenance is often treated as an appendage to the primary software products, with a surprising inattention to optimization of the offering. Here are signs that you may be neglecting your maintenance business and leaving millions of dollars of (mostly bottom line) revenue off of the table: Lack of a maintenance offering. Sometimes software companies seem overwhelmed or new to software and declare that they “provide updates and bug fixes for free for as long as the customer owns the product. Maybe someday, we'll have an offering”. Maintenance is not treated like a product, where it is assigned a product manager, whose responsibility is define the product, price it, and communicate its salient features to customers and channel partners. Maintenance renewals are not handled by a separate and dedicated team whose role is to generate high renewals rates and protect/grow the existing maintenance revenue stream. Without this level of focus, maintenance revenue is frequently cannibalized in preference of new license revenue. The maintenance offering is often ill-defined other than “phone support and updates”. Little consideration is given to what is included in an “update” and what might the value be to the customer. Are there boundaries to what functionality defines an “update” you receive on maintenance as opposed to an option that is paid as an “upgrade”? Software companies often have poor discipline accurately keeping accurate records of their customers – either by company name or by key contacts at their customers. This means that the maintenance renewal process cannot be effectively performed, if it can be performed at all. The problem becomes worse if sales are made through an indirect sales channel. Keeping accurate customer and sales records allows companies to track maintenance revenue and renewal rates which can gauge the health of their business long term. Pricing for maintenance is very ad-hoc, over-simplified, and pays little attention to the product lifecycle. Maintenance may have 1 or 2 price points that reflect an annual price that is a simple percentage of the purchase price of the original software license. Little value is given to the fact some products may provide tremendous value with their updates and may reflect a different price than maintenance on another product. Also, phone support is rarely separated from software updates (although often for good reason). Maintenance and renewal are typically overlooked when an event occurs on the product associated with the maintenance. A price change to the list license price of the product has the same result to maintenance and must be explained at renewal. When products are re-packaged and re-bundled, entire customer configurations often have to be adjusted to reflect the new packaging and pricing, leading to many manual steps to align current product offerings with what the customer originally purchased. While many of the problems above are related to ” entitlement management ” business processes and systems where Flexera Software can help you, a good first step is to honestly evaluate your maintenance business and to make it a priority with good leadership.

Will the Perpetual Software License Model Ever Go Away? That Depends Upon Who You Ask…

By Cris Wendt The perpetual software license model won't seem to go away, as much as the press and various surveys seem to indicate. The perpetual license model has been the predominant method for selling the software license for most software for the past 30 years. With this approach, software is purchased with the right to use software into perpetuity. Of course, most software only has a useful lifetime of anywhere from 3 – 10 years. The software will eventually become obsolete due to a number of factors including the obsolescence of the underlying hardware, the changing nature of the problem that is being solved, or the availability of better software. To remedy this situation, a maintenance plan is offered whereby a combination of phone support and software updates or “refreshes” are provided. For better or worse, companies know how to sell this software and manage all of the associated business and accounting practices, and, end-customers know how to deploy this license model. The alternative, broadly speaking, is the subscription or time-based license model. With this license model the right to use the software expires after some amount of time, and the license must be purchased again if it is to continue being used. In some cases (the subscription model), the right to install software updates is included. As described in previous blogs, there are different financial reasons why some markets, or some specific customers prefer one license model over another. For the past several years, Flexera Software and IDC have been conducting an annual survey asking a variety of software producers in various markets which license model generates the most revenue, and, how they expect that mix to change. While there is some variance among different markets and in the actual numbers, the general answer seems to remain the same every year – almost like the recurring day in the movie “Groundhog Day” – About 66% of the revenue comes from perpetual licenses, 34% of the revenue come from subscription licenses or some other variant. Furthermore, respondents say that they expect the mix to change about 10% toward offering more subscription licenses and away from the perpetual license. However, the results of this perceived migration toward more revenue being generated by time-based licenses hasn't occurred. Perhaps we've reached an aggregated plateau where the license models have stabilized based upon the various forces and value propositions in different markets. My guess is that this situation won't change, ever………..with one caveat – this will be the case for on-premises software – that is, the case where software runs on machines at the customer environment. In these situations, the hardware and software form a system unit that is more physical than virtual, so a license model that matches to a machine lifecycle makes sense. However, as we enable our customers to take advantage of mobile computing and elastic compute models built upon virtualization and the cloud, then perpetual licenses will be non-existent and pay-per-use or time-based models will be the norm. So is the perpetual software license model going away? Well, that depends upon who you ask.