Posts Tagged ‘companies’

What legal options are available to companies outsourcing software for protecting intellectual property?

What legal avenues for protecting intellectual property are available to US companies who are outsourcing software to countries like China, India, Russia and the Ukraine?
Right now I have standard NDA and licensing agreements with my US based contractors, which have some enforcement and damages clauses but how do these hold up with in other countries? What do I need to do to protect my source code from appearing out on the internet somewhere?

Do companies give rewards for reporting copyright infringement?

I know of a local high school band, who uses a corporate logo in their band art. This picture is used on shirts and other things they sell. If I were to report this to the company that owns the logo, is there a chance that I would get a reward?
Don’t post spam. I’m not visiting your website. This isn’t my first rodeo, so grow up.

Why Don’t the Video Game Companies Allow Us to Download a Copy of ALL Their Past Game Titles for a Fee?

I’m not really a fan of buying physical copies of games, unless I can’t legally get it any other way. I prefer downloading the games for the convenience and you don’t have to worry about them getting damaged. You might say that they are already doing this, but why not with ALL of their past titles? I enjoy some of the old school games that are unavailable to me legally through downloading. Also, this would be another great opportunity for the video game companies to make more money.
Some kind of system similar to Steam (By Valve) would be ideal for this method.
This goes for all (Mainly the Popular Titles) Video Games including Computer Games.
Unless you can’t think of any other reason, Please don’t answer this question with “It Promotes Piracy.” I know that piracy is immoral and I don’t practice it.

Software Licensing Compliance and the ISO 19770-2 Standard: Medicine or Vitamin?

By: Cris Wendt Software publishers have many ways to license and price their product – for example they can change the underlying revenue model by throttling between a perpetual license and time-based license, as well as offer different metrics to apply product pricing, such as named user, instance, number of managed devices, number of CPU's etc. The duration and metric can be combined to offer pay-per-use or usage-based models. Various combinations of duration and metric can enable a software publisher to bring a variety of price points to market. One issue faced by most every software publisher in offering such a variety of software license models is how to they ensure that their products are being used within the bounds of their license agreement? The goal is to balance the revenue capture for all usage, without being a nuisance to the end-user. For some software publishers, the use of embedded technology such as a license manager to make the products “compliant aware” is one approach that has proven successful, especially in science and engineering vertical markets and high-tech equipment markets (e.g. medical, telecom and industrial control). For other companies who sell enterprise software to large enterprises, the goal is not to embed any technology but to allow Software Asset Management ( SAM ) tools to detect the forensics of installed software and to gather this information into a consolidated report. This information can then be used by the customer SAM manager, and, the software publisher for a fact-based discussion on usage and fees. The rub is that virtually no software among software vendors has the same installation (or usage) “fingerprint” to make the process simple. SAM tools have to be configured to a complex set of rules that determine installation characteristics and license agreement rules to provide useful reports. The emergence of the ISO 19770-2 standard is a leading contender to bring simplicity to this matter. By creating “software tagging” standards, it becomes easier for all stakeholders in the software production and usage chain to create, read and consume information vital to ensuring compliance to license models and agreements. This in turn leads to more standardized processes, technologies, and trained practitioners. So far, industry adoption has been underwhelming. I often tease my colleague, David Wright, an industry compliance expert from VeriTag , that about 50 people in the world care about the ISO 19770-2 standard. I tell him that the ISO standard seems to be more of a vitamin than a medicine, a reference to an expression I hear VC's tell people when they want to tell you that you have “an interesting idea”, but it's not a very compelling business proposition. But, perhaps ISO 19770-2 is on its way to becoming a compliance medicine? Symantec and Adobe are beginning to adopt it as a standard method to tag software. I see other software publishers looking to use a software tagging methodology, and see it as an intriguing possibility. There are efforts by the Federal ITAM group within the GSA to create a standard for the consumption of software, requiring the government to adhere to this standard. Perhaps this could be the tipping point? Anyone out there feel the same way?

When upgrading to a new release of a software, larger companies often to all of the following except what?

1. When upgrading to a new release of a software, larger companies often do all of the following except:
a. Upgrade immediately.
b. Research the new release.
c. Wait on upgrading until “bug fixes” are completed.
d. Evaluate the price of upgrading to the new release of the software.
2. When a company needs to upgrade software licenses of five or more copies, the company should consider:
a. volume licensing
b. single licensing
c. All of the above
d. None of the above
.

Is piracy the main reason why software companies are incurring losses these days?

The Ten Step Process: Step 10—Organizational Changes to Help You Unleash the Power of Selling Software – Converting Your High-Tech Company into a…

By: Cris Wendt As traditional high-tech device manufacturers begin the transition to selling software and offering software licensing to generate new revenue streams—either through software up-sell for advanced capabilities, or through the addition of pure-play software (as discussed in previous blogs)—an area manufacturers need to pay close attention to are the organization and compensation issues and challenges that could undermine their capability to succeed. Manufacturers, whose DNA is wired to sell hardware and give away software, often find it difficult to achieve their desired software revenue targets. The core challenge is that account managers and sales teams are used to selling a physical device on a “cost plus” model, and have trained their customers to think the same way. The sales teams, facilitated by marketing material, tend to place value on underlying hardware capacity, capability and cost. If a sales deal becomes competitive, the software is often discounted 100% and becomes a sweetener to the deal. Over time, this becomes, as one product manager told me, “a race to the bottom”. To transition from a company selling only hardware or hardware-centric systems, a more “value centric” selling model will require some comprehensive planning, but will almost always involve the following organizational changes and considerations once executive management has made a decision to become more software-centric: Assign product marketing leadership dedicated to software products, and compensate them partly on the revenue generated from the software . It's a good idea to staff with professionals with previous software product management and marketing experience. These individuals will understand how to sell and position the selling of software licenses and maintenance, help significantly in the migration to a value-based software-centric selling model. Sales management buy-in. To succeed, you must get sales management buy-in and the management must exhibit leadership in the selling of software and software value. Sales compensation models can have a dramatic effect on results. Rather than compensating sales management and their teams on a single bookings target, consider changing the compensation to favor the sales of software, and perhaps, software renewals. I have seen companies virtually change behavior overnight when new compensation models were launched to favor the sales of software and renewals. Marketing & Sales Management training on selling software. To help marketing and sales succeed be sure to design and launch comprehensive internal training programs to align Marketing, Sales, and Support on how to value, sell and support software. Over time, all departments in the organization are impacted by making this transition from a hardware centric company to becoming a thriving software company, but if sales and marketing leadership are aligned and compensated, the rest of the organization changes that may be required, will follow more smoothly. Did you miss a step? Here are the links to each step. The Ten Step Process: Converting Your High-Tech Company into a Thriving Software Company Step 1 – Understanding the Opportunity that Becoming a Software Company Can Offer Step 2 – Use Software Licensing Methodology to Enable Product Agility in the Marketplace Step 3 – Balancing Revenue Recovery & Customer Satisfaction with Your Software Compliance Strategy Step 4 – A Paradigm for the Delivery of Digital Goods Step 5 – Begin the Process Journey: Designing for Entitlements and Fulfillments Step 6 – The Importance of the Software License Lifecycle Step 7 – Designing “Prospect to Support” (P2S) Software Licensing Business Processes Step 8—Empower Customers with Entitlement Management Self-Serve Capabilities Step 9—Licensing Supply Chain Secrets High-Tech Companies Need to Know I hope that this 10 Step series on Converting Your High-Tech Company into a Thriving Software Company has been helpful and information. What strategies have you employed to help your company make the transition?

Why do some software companies require four wheeler driving license from their employees?

Can software companies do anything to prevent piracy?

It seems like most software products can easily be obtain by entering a serial number (which is stupid) or using some patch. They are smart enough to make the product. Shouldn’t they be smart enough to at least make it hard to use rather than require a serial?

Why You Should Care About Software Updates?

By: Crispin Luxton While one might expect that only software vendors would care about software updates, it turns out that many high-tech manufacturers and enterprises are also in the software business today. In fact, many high-tech manufacturers provide customers with software add-ons or embedded software in hardware products. And, many enterprises develop custom applications for use by internal staff and independent dealers or distributors. In all these cases, there's a growing need to manage the development, delivery and support of software on a regular basis. In today's relentlessly changing business environment, software has to be updated constantly… Features have to be added to address evolving needs Fixes have to be provided to resolve quality and security issues Updates to your software may also be required because of how other vendors have upgraded the other “moving parts” in the IT environment Many software vendors, high-tech manufacturers and enterprises view software updates as an after-thought. But, in a business environment that is becoming increasingly dependent on software applications and devices with embedded software, the need to quickly and accurately deliver new capabilities in a cost effective, low-touch manner is critical to delivering an exceptional customer, partner and employee experience. The consequences of an inadequate software update process can include: Dissatisfied customers – if your software updates are too intrusive, too frequent, don't work properly, or aren't properly supported, your customers can quickly become dissatisfied. Reduced profits – the more software versions you have in your installed base, the greater your development, delivery and support costs. Lost market share – Companies compete with each other based on their performance across the entire spectrum of value attributes. If your organization can quickly and cost-efficiently roll out updates that are well-aligned with the changing needs of your customers, partners and/or users—and do so consistently—you will gain a sustainable competitive advantage over those that cannot. Increased risk exposure – problems with software updates can expose your organization to all kinds of business risks—such as interruptions of service, liability for customer business losses, erosion of brand value, and exposure of confidential information. For these reasons and others, every organization should invest in the optimization of its software update process. Failure to eliminate any shortcomings in this process will almost certainly have an adverse impact on your top- and bottom-line business performance. Next time: Why Is Software Updating Such a Challenge?

Why aren’t stuffed animal companies sued for copyright infringement when they use copyright music?

I’m sure you all know of the stuffed animals where you press the hand on the bear and it plays a song. For example, my boyfriend gave me this bear that plays “Lollipop” by the Chordettes whenever I press its palm.
Since these bears play songs that are copyrighted material, why aren’t these stuffed animal companies being sued for copyright infringement?
It’s just not fair that they allow stuffed animal companies to own these songs without threats of infringement suits and/or heavy fines.

I’m really freaking out- How often do companies press charges for piracy?

I got an ‘Notice of Claim of Copyright Infringement’ after I downloaded the Sherlock Holmes movie illegally. How likely is it that they are gonna press charges? I downloaded it on the 17th this month, they sent it two days later, on the 19th, and I just deleted it now. It was only a level one. But what’s the chance they will press charges?
P.S. Please don’t say something like, ‘You shouldn’t have downloaded it in the first place.’